Origin - Reference to committee: Doc. Pornography has become a highly lucrative business and is consumed by a growing number of people, in particular on the Internet. The Parliamentary Assembly should warn against the desensitisation resulting from continued exposure or addiction to such types of pornography, and against a process of normalisation in which moral coercion and physical violence, in particular against women, become acceptable. Council of Europe member states should ensure effective implementation of their existing legislation in the field of pornography, encourage scientific research to assess the impact of violent and extreme pornographic images on the user and consider introducing specific legislation criminalising the possession, production and distribution of violent and extreme pornographic material. See related documents Report Doc.
Who decides what is ‘extreme pornography’ that could send you to jail?
Section 63 of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act - Wikipedia
Welcome to the Digital Spy forums. Forums Recent Rules My Activity. Hey there! Sign In Register.
BBC Sport (International version)
The UK government has put extensive protections in place to ensure that the general public — particularly those under the age of 18 years old — are not adversely affected by pornography. The protections form part of a wider government effort to censor certain harmful information and materials on the Internet and elsewhere, such as copyright violations, libellous communications, depiction of animal abuse, terroristic propaganda and literature, and other extreme text, images, videos, and audio files. The purpose of this guide from our expert criminal defence solicitors is to give you an overview of some of the main laws relating to one such potentially harmful material: pornography.
This legislation was introduced with the following rationale expressed in the Home Office consultation:. The offence is provided for by section 63 of the Act. It criminalises the possession of an "extreme pornographic image". Expert evidence is not likely to be admissible to demonstrate whether an image is pornographic or not. The intention of the defendant or their sexual arousal is not relevant either.